Compound Interest and Savings Growth Calculator
Explore a single growth scenario with compounding and contributions.
Model two return and fee assumptions using the same starting balance and contribution schedule. The comparison excludes tax and does not rank real products or establish suitability.
A comparison is useful only when the amount and timing of money invested are held constant. This calculator applies two sets of return and balance-fee assumptions to the same saving schedule, separating their projected outcomes from product selection.
Both scenarios begin with the same capital and receive the same contributions at the selected beginning or end of each period.
Each scenario converts its annual effective return and annual balance charge into periodic growth and deductions. Fees affect future growth because the deducted money no longer remains invested.
The difference subtracts scenario B from scenario A. Both nominal balances are also divided by the same cumulative inflation factor to express purchasing power.
Sample inputs demonstrate the method. They are not a forecast or product offer.
In the first example, both scenarios start at 1,000, grow at 10% for two years and have no deposits or fees. Their balances are identical, so A minus B is zero.
Sample inputs demonstrate the method. They are not a forecast or product offer.
A positive difference means A has the larger projected balance under the supplied assumptions. It does not say that A has lower risk, better liquidity or stronger guarantees.
The fee figures describe this modelled charging pattern. They do not reproduce a provider's complete tariff, and no tax or historical performance data is added.
Compare two investment scenarios over the same horizon and contributions, with separate returns and balance fees.
Tax and guarantees are not modelled. A higher projected value alone does not establish suitability.
Read our calculation and testing approach.